High Court adjourns as Gachagua lawyers demand clarity on three-judge bench formation
Gachagua had sought clarification on how DCJ Philomena Mwilu selected the three-judge panel without an order by the Chief Justice.
A three-judge panel overseeing the impeachment case of ousted Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua adjourned proceedings for one hour on Tuesday, allowing both parties time to file objections challenging its validity.
The bench consists of Justices Eric Ogolla, Anthony Mrima, and Freda Mugambi.
More To Read
- Businessman moves to court to stop three-judge bench from hearing Gachagua’s impeachment case
- CJ Koome retains three-judge bench to hear Gachagua petitions
- Gachagua reveals why Ruto’s photos still hang in his home: ‘A constant reminder of betrayal’
- Gachagua to launch new party, vows to unite Mt Kenya, challenge Ruto ahead of polls
- UDA MP struggles to justify need for Ruto’s Mt Kenya visit for development to happen
- Registrar gazettes UDA's proposed ouster of Gachagua as deputy party leader, seeks public feedback
Gachagua had sought clarification on how Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu selected the three-judge panel to review a state appeal aimed at overturning the ruling that blocked Kithure Kindiki’s appointment as deputy president.
His lawyer, Senior Counsel Paul Muite, argued that only the Chief Justice has the authority to form such a panel. The court, however, learnt that the DCJ acted on behalf of the CJ, who was out of the country at the moment.
Nonetheless, Gachagua's lawyers also wanted to know when the file arrived from Kerugoya at 4 pm for the Deputy Chief Justice to appoint Justices Anthony Mrima, Eric Ogola, and Fridah Mugambi to handle the case.
The Kerugoya file contains the orders that stopped Kindiki from taking office. Soon after, Solicitor General Shaddrack Mose filed a request to cancel those orders.
Justice Mugambi, who works in Kerugoya, has scheduled the application to be heard on Tuesday.
"Permit us to articulate these issues for the sake of the nation. We are not aware how the bench was constituted by the DCJ to hear these files," Gachagua's legal team noted.
They are questioning how the Deputy Chief Justice got the power to form the panel and why the Chief Justice delegated her duties if that’s what happened.
Gachagua's lawyers argue that only the Chief Justice has the authority to create a panel, saying it’s not just an administrative matter.
Top Stories Today
